In a significant development, Kelsey Fitzsimmons was acquitted of assault with a dangerous weapon on March 26, 2026, in North Andover, Massachusetts. The trial, presided over by Judge Jeffrey Karp, followed a shooting incident that occurred on June 30, 2025, where Fitzsimmons was shot by Officer Patrick Noonan.
The trial began with opening statements and witness testimony, during which Fitzsimmons testified that she only pointed the gun at her own head in a suicide attempt, stating, “I wanted to kill myself, me and my gun, no one else involved.” This emotional testimony was pivotal in the jury’s understanding of her state of mind during the incident.
Fitzsimmons had spent 103 days in jail following the shooting, which was precipitated by her being served a restraining order filed by her ex-fiancé. The prosecution argued that Fitzsimmons lied about the incident, claiming that her narrative was physically impossible. James Gubitose, representing the prosecution, stated, “She got up on that stand and she lied to you. It’s scientifically and physically impossible for her story to have happened the way that she said.”
Despite the prosecution’s assertions, Judge Karp deliberated for less than two hours before reaching a verdict. He remarked, “I am left with a reasonable doubt and I am duty-bound to find that the Commonwealth has not met its burden to prove that Ms. Fitzsimmons committed an assault by means of a dangerous weapon.” This statement underscored the challenges faced by the prosecution in establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Notably, the trial lacked body camera footage from the police officers involved, which could have provided critical evidence regarding the events of the shooting. Fitzsimmons had waived her right to a jury trial, opting for a bench trial instead, which ultimately led to her acquittal.
The case has drawn attention not only for its legal implications but also for its exploration of mental health issues and the interactions between civilians and law enforcement. The absence of video evidence has raised questions about transparency and accountability in police conduct.
As the trial concluded, reactions from both sides were mixed. Timothy Bradl, Fitzsimmons’ attorney, expressed relief, stating, “This should be over. It should be an acquittal, your honor.” Meanwhile, the prosecution’s disappointment reflects the complexities involved in cases of this nature.
With the verdict delivered, Kelsey Fitzsimmons can now begin to move forward after a tumultuous period marked by legal battles and personal struggles. The implications of this case may resonate beyond the courtroom, prompting discussions about mental health, police practices, and the judicial process.
